Cases 11 - 20 of 23
BROOKINS v. BRISTOL TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv00252
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID BROOKINS
Defendant:
BRISTOL TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, ALDRED H. EASTLACK, RUDLOPH RUDY HEIERLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv07607
Plaintiff:
PAMELA A. MILLS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MILLS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv05986
Plaintiff:
JEROME MILLS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARNOLD v. MEISEL et al
as 5:2013cv02157
Plaintiff:
MARC ANTHONY JAMES ARNOLD
Defendant:
DALE MEISEL, EDWARD SWEENEY, CINDY EQIZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATTS et al v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2012cv06717
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT A. BATTS, CHAL KENNEDY, MICHAEL MCCRAY and others
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, MICHAEL NUTTER and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLS v. CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2012cv03199
Plaintiff:
DARRYL MILLS
Defendant:
CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROGERS v. MILLS et al
as 2:2011cv04706
Plaintiff:
TROY LAMONT ROGERS
Defendant:
MILLS, BRISTOL TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT. and UNKNOWN OFFICERS & DEA AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLS v. CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2010cv05884
Plaintiff:
ALAN BRUCE MILLS
Defendant:
CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANCH v. MILLS, et al
as 2:2010cv01860
Plaintiff:
KEITH BRANCH
Defendant:
MILLS and MR. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLAIN v. ARIAS et al
as 2:2009cv00922
Plaintiff:
RALPH WILLIAM MCCLAIN, JR.
Defendant:
FELIPE ARIAS, JOHN LONG, MAC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
