Cases 11 - 20 of 31
ROSARIO v. READING HOSPITAL et al
as 5:2019cv02170
Defendant:
TROOPER BRIAN ROLAND, MAGISTRAIT ANN L. YOUNG, TROOPER GARY A. WILLIARD, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS A. ROSARIO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. USA
as 5:2016cv05129
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ROSARIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
NEGRON v. ROSARIO et al
as 5:2016cv04642
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W. NEGRON
Defendant:
ROSARIO and AXELBAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2016cv03561
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ROSARIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BONES v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ________________
as 5:2016cv00125
Petitioner:
JAVIER ROSARIO BONES
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ________________ and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NOBA-ROSARIO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv06503
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JUAN DIONISIO NOBA-ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROSARIO v. THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2014cv05173
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROSARIO
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, JOHN DELANEY, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO-BONES v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INCORPORATION et al
as 5:2014cv03999
Plaintiff:
JAVIER ROSARIO-BONES
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INCORPORATION, DENNIS MOLYNEAR, JOSEPH SHIFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO-BONES v. CHANCE et al
as 5:2014cv04000
Plaintiff:
JAVIER ROSARIO-BONES
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2013cv07133
Petitioner:
WALDEMAR ROSARIO
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
