Cases 21 - 30 of 215
RILEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05360
Petitioner:
NATHAN RILEY
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOONE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05364
Plaintiff:
LAMONT BOONE
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, JAMIE SORBER and SCI-PHX MED DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOONE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05362
Plaintiff:
LAMONT BOONE
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, PA. DOC PHX INMATE TRANSPORTATION and SCI-PHX MED/DEPT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOONE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05365
Plaintiff:
LAMOUNT BOONE
Defendant:
PA.DOC SEC. JOHN WETZEL, TAMMY FERGUSON and SCI-MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COULSTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05218
Petitioner:
TROY COULSTON
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, BARRY SMITH and LAWRENCE KRASNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HINES v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2021cv05203
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. HINES, III
Defendant:
TAMMY FERGUSON, MANDY SIPPLE, C.E.R.T. JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv04973
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
SECRETRAY JOHN WETZEL, KELLY LONG, MELLISSA SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOBBLEN v. BRITTIAN et al
as 2:2021cv04726
Petitioner:
WILLIAM NOBBLEN
Respondent:
SUPT. KATHY BRITTIAN, SEC. JOHN WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BEYERS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv03393
Petitioner:
AMY BEYERS
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRACEY v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv02825
Defendant:
MANDY SIPPLE, JOHN WETZEL, MARK C. GARMAN and others
Plaintiff:
COREY BRACEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
