Cases 21 - 30 of 121
QUIJANO et al v. BERKS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2020cv01362
Petitioner:
LUZ E QUIJANO, JESUS M CRESPO, LUIS ENRIQUE MORALES and others
Respondent:
READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, DALE R. TRYTHALL, JR., LARRY SNYDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv04848
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CASTILLO v. GUZLEY et al
as 5:2019cv04002
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE CASTILLO
Defendant:
ATTENDING "JOHN DOE", MARISA R. LOPEZ RODRIGUEZ, OFFICER BRYAN GUZLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ et al v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 5:2019cv03988
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN ROBERT WOLFE, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., LORI HEHNLY and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 5:2019cv02771
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
ABEL ROSARIO RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RODRIGUEZ v. COMMISSARY STAFF
as 2:2019cv00736
Defendant:
COMMISSARY STAFF
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. COURT SHERIFF OFFICIAL
as 2:2019cv00605
Defendant:
COURT SHERIFF OFFICIAL
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Jacques
as 5:2019cv00325
Petitioner:
Hector Rodriguez, Rojas and Victor Rojas
Respondent:
Warden I. Jacques
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2017cv04668
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RODRIGUEZ v. SCI-MERCER et al
as 2:2017cv04294
Petitioner:
MARINO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
SCI-MERCER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
