Cases 21 - 30 of 489
SMITH v. DET. RYAN MCCARTNEY'S SUPERVISOR et al
as 2:2023cv01456
Plaintiff:
CALVIN SMITH
Defendant:
DET. RYAN MCCARTNEY, JDG. D. ANHATT, PUBLIC DEFENDER MONIT ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KITTRELL v. SMITH et al
as 2:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
ANDRE KITTRELL
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, LIEUTENANT OLIVER, JEFF MEASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EKEH v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONROE COUNTY, PA et al
as 2:2023cv00764
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY U. EKEH
Defendant:
C0URT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONROE COUNTY, PA, MDJ. HON. KRESGE, JUDGE HIGGINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. BERKS COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
WES LEE BROWN
Defendant:
BERKS COUNTY JAIL, COUNTY OF BERKS PA, WARDEN JEFFREY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv00594
Petitioner:
REINARD SMITH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: SMITH
as 2:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
DEVON A.R. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: EUGENE SMITH
as 2:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
EUGENE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. MCGEE et al
as 2:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
DEVON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SEAN MCGEE, SEAN SMITH and KELLY L. DEANGELIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv04975
Petitioner:
MARK HENDERSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
IN RE: EUGENE SMITH
as 2:2022cv04974
Plaintiff:
EUGENE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
