Cases 31 - 40 of 50
SHORT v. BYRNE et al
as 2:2019cv03020
Defendant:
OFFICER TAIEFF HALL, MS. MARIEL, OFFICER KENNEY and others
Plaintiff:
HARVEY PATRICK SHORT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PYATT v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02444
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN MARIO COLUCCI, WARDEN DAVID BYRNES, GEO GROUP INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RANDALL PYATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAUNDERS v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02322
Defendant:
C/O KENNETH, GEO GROUP INC., JOHN A. REILLY, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICHOLS v. LOPPE et al
as 2:2019cv02264
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER STARKEY, SARAH BOWLES, JAMES MATTERA and others
Plaintiff:
RONELL NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 2:2019cv01971
Defendant:
DR. PHILLIPS, C/O BAGWELL, C/O CAMPAGNA and others
Plaintiff:
GARTOR KIKI BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEAMER v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2019cv00650
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and GEO GROUP
Plaintiff:
ZAHKEE FATTAH BEAMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALI v. PAUP et al
as 2:2019cv00280
Defendant:
RACQUEL, KATAYOUN COPELAND, JOHN HOSIER and others
Plaintiff:
ANWAR SHARIF ALI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRY v. MCCANN et al
as 2:2018cv05444
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GEO GROUP, INC., WARDEN BYRNES and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. CURRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEY v. BURNS, et al
as 5:2018cv05298
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL W. COLEY
Defendant:
DAVID BURNS, MARIO COLLUCCI, CORRECTIONS OFFICERS ANDERSON & YEBOAH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EWELL v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTION FACILITY et al
as 2:2018cv04872
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTION FACILITY, ASST WARDEN COLLUCCI, ADMIN MEDICAL SERVICES DPT and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY W. EWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
