Cases 31 - 40 of 50
TURNER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv05456
Plaintiff:
QUINTON TURNER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (CFCF) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2010cv04388
Petitioner:
WILLIAM D. TURNER
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES, SETH WILLIAMS and TOM COBERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TURNER v. MAZURKIEWICZ
as 2:2010cv02159
Petitioner:
PHILIP TURNER
Respondent:
JOSEPH F. MAZURKIEWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAILEY et al v. AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2010cv01833
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY, DAMION NELSON, JASPER JOCKERY and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, HARELY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY et al v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2010cv01834
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY, DAMION NELSON, JASPER DUCKERY and others
Defendant:
HARELY G. LAPPIN, AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, CONNELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. ABRAHAM et al
as 2:2009cv03856
Plaintiff:
STEVEN TURNER
Defendant:
LYNNE ABRAHAM, PAMELA COLE and VIVIAN MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv01293
Plaintiff:
ROSCOE TURNER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, DARRYL ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TURNER v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2009cv01156
Petitioner:
DAVID TURNER
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN and COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. OF PHILADELPHIA, COUNTY, PA.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TURNER v. BARONE et al
as 2:2009cv00955
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL TURNER
Respondent:
MICHAEL C. BARONE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv06049
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
