Cases 41 - 50 of 179
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv00415
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROBINSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JACKSON v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2019cv05824
Respondent:
RN, FORMER CHCA SHIRLEY LAWS-SMITH, PA-C JOHN NICHOLSON, MD BENJAMIN V. ROBINSON and others
Defendant:
SAMIRRAH MINNIS, MANDEE QUINN, MARK WAHL and others
Plaintiff:
TYREEK JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROBINSON v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2019cv04771
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT LONNIE OLIVER and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Petitioner:
MONIQUE ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBINSON v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2019cv04667
Defendant:
OFFICER ROGERS., SGT. CURRAN and TAMMY FERGUSON
Plaintiff:
ROBBIE ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. MICHELLE
as 5:2019cv02956
Defendant:
MICHELLE
Plaintiff:
ROSHIE ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv02424
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HAILEY v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2019cv02171
Defendant:
CAPT. BERGER, P/O CARL ROBINSON, KATHLEEN A. MCLAUGHLIN and others
Plaintiff:
ALVIN MAURICE HAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. KIRSCH et al
as 5:2019cv00953
Defendant:
LEONA, JESSIE KIRSCH, MITZI MONTZ and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2019cv00878
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Petitioner:
JAMES ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2019cv00116
Plaintiff:
VERNON ROBINSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
