Cases 41 - 50 of 62
CARROLL v. PHILA COUNTY PRISON-CFCF
as 2:2012cv01603
Plaintiff:
MARK CARROLL
Defendant:
PHILA COUNTY PRISON-CFCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARDEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2011cv07810
Plaintiff:
REIDAR CARROLL ARDEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HARDING v. MEISEL et al
as 5:2011cv07370
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARDING
Defendant:
DALE MEISEL, NANCY AFFLERBACH, CARROL SOMMERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2011cv06439
Petitioner:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Respondent:
EDWARD MCFADDEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER (JOSEPH CARROLL) and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA (LINDA KELLY)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CREDICO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv05112
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION COMMISSION, WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. JOHN DOE I et al
as 2:2011cv04877
Plaintiff:
MELVIN W. GREEN
Defendant:
RICHARD PAULLMAN, CARROLL FORREST, JUAN ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARROLL v. PENNSYLVANIA COURTS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE et al
as 2:2011cv03575
Plaintiff:
WESLEY CARROLL
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA COURTS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, ZUGMONT PINES, JOHN A. VASKOV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2011cv03462
Plaintiff:
RONALD ROBINSON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, WILLIAMS, C. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv03100
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL GREEN, JOE CARROLL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03114
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
