Cases 41 - 50 of 54
DIAZ v. BODNAY et al
as 5:2010cv05939
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL DIAZ
Defendant:
BODNAY , ABERTS WILLIAMS , SENOME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAZ v. MYERS et al
as 2:2010cv01504
Plaintiff:
HENRY DIAZ
Defendant:
BRYAN MYERS, RICHARD WOERTZ, LYNNE ABRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIAZ v. C.F.C.F.
as 2:2010cv01154
Plaintiff:
HENRY DIAZ
Defendant:
C.F.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIAZ v. BRITTON et al
as 2:2009cv03109
Petitioner:
CARMELO DIAZ
Respondent:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DIAZ
as 2:2009cv02030
Petitioner:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent:
CARMELO DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIAZ v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2009cv01314
Petitioner:
TONY DIAZ
Respondent:
LOUIS S. FOLINO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DIAZ et al v. RIZZARDI et al
as 2:2008cv05427
Plaintiff:
LUIS DIAZ, RICHARD ALLEN and ALFRED MAYO
Defendant:
SCOTT RIZZARDI, MICHAEL BUCHANAN, HANK FULSKI and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BAKER et al v. DIAZ et al
as 5:2008cv05331
Plaintiff:
DONNA MARIE BAKER and MATTHEW RAY MARTIN
Defendant:
JOSEPH DIAZ, DAWN FISTER, GEORGE WAGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. DEMEHICK et al
as 2:2008cv04648
Plaintiff:
KEVIN YOUNG
Defendant:
WENDY DEMEHICK, JUDGE C. PIERCE, JEFFREY R. DELP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DIAZ v. MCCUSKER et al
as 2:2008cv01033
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY DIAZ
Defendant:
MCCUSKER, MARY CANINO and CAPT. JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
