Cases 41 - 50 of 50
LINDER v. FOLCROFT POLICE DEPT et al
as 2:2018cv04844
Defendant:
ASST WARDEN JAMES MATTERA, MEDICAL SERVICES DEPT, DANIEL E. WHITE and others
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM LINDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRENCH v. THE GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04312
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and THE GEO GROUP INC.
Plaintiff:
MARK FRENCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEY v. CURRENT WARDEN ET AL et al
as 2:2018cv04127
Defendant:
MICHELLE SCHADE, GEO GROUP INC., CURRENT WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL WYDELL COLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICHOLS v. PHILLIPS et al
as 2:2017cv02604
Plaintiff:
RONELL NICHOLS
Defendant:
RONALD PHILLIPS, BOB RAWLINS, KRISTEN GRATY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JEAN-JACQUES v. THE MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2015cv04706
Plaintiff:
SNIDERS JEAN-JACQUES
Defendant:
THE MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and GEO GROUP, INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JEAN-JACQUES v. THE MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2015cv02336
Plaintiff:
SNIDERS JEAN-JACQUES
Defendant:
THE MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and GEO GROUP, INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HURTADO v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01766
Plaintiff:
JUAN HURTADO
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY CORDINATOR, M. ROHRBACKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTINEZ v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01459
Plaintiff:
SAUL MARTINEZ
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., JOSEPH TAVARES, GC WIGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv03841
Plaintiff:
JEROME SMITH
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC. , MYERS , HOLAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSH v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 2:2008cv00048
Plaintiff:
FELDON BUSH
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY, JOHN DOE, DELAWARE COUNTY PRISON BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
