Cases 41 - 50 of 162
ANDREWS v. KELLY et al
as 2:2019cv00107
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREWS
Defendant:
LT. G. DIGUARDI, SGT. CURRAN, JOHN AND JANE DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2018cv04182
Plaintiff:
IRVIN SAMUEL HARPER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DETECTIVE DANIEL O'MALLEY, NURSE TONI SEAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLAH v. O'CONNER et al
as 2:2018cv04048
Defendant:
SUPERVISOR JANE DOE #1, DIRECTOR JOHN DOE #1, SUPERVISOR MR. COX and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL M. ALLAH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. BANTA et al
as 2:2018cv03670
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
KELLY LONG, BANTA and SCI PHOENIX'S ENTIRE MAILROOM UNKNOWN PERSONNEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv02541
Plaintiff:
REGINALD S. LEWIS
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, CYNTHIA LINK, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASH v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2018cv02114
Plaintiff:
OMAR SHARIFF CASH
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, JOHN KELLY, KRISTJEN NIELSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01976
Plaintiff:
IRVIN SAMUEL HARPER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, KELLY HARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PLOWMAN v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv01592
Plaintiff:
ALEX PLOWMAN
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TODD KELLY, JEFFREY AUKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLAIN v. TIMBERMAN et al
as 2:2017cv05839
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR.
Defendant:
TARA J. TIMBERMAN, TOM COSTA, CHRISTIAN STEPHENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. HARRELL et al
as 2:2017cv05603
Plaintiff:
IRVIN HARPER
Defendant:
KELLY HARRELL, LARRY KRASNER, DANIAL OMALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
