Cases 41 - 50 of 68
ROGERS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv00639
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ROGERS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PICKENS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2012cv06178
Plaintiff:
ROGER M. PICKENS
Defendant:
SETH WILLIAMS, BEN BAER, STACY HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REAVES v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE et al
as 2:2012cv04950
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH REAVES
Defendant:
CYNTHIA DAUB, DANNY GOSS, ROGER WAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2012cv04063
Petitioner:
SHARIF BROWN
Respondent:
PETER ROGERS, ALLISON WORYSZ and KATHLEEN GAUGHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2012cv03654
Petitioner:
DWAINE SCOTT
Respondent:
PETER ROGERS, SETH WILLIAMS, K. THURSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROGERS v. WALSH et al
as 2:2012cv02881
Petitioner:
ERIC ROGERS
Respondent:
JEROME WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROGERS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2011cv07568
Petitioner:
SEAN ROGERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROGERS v. MILLS et al
as 2:2011cv04706
Plaintiff:
TROY LAMONT ROGERS
Defendant:
MILLS, BRISTOL TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT. and UNKNOWN OFFICERS & DEA AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. UNKNOWN OFFICER'S
as 2:2011cv04062
Plaintiff:
TROY L. ROGERS
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICER'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. C.F.C.F. et al
as 2:2011cv03491
Plaintiff:
RONGENO ROGERS
Defendant:
CFCF WARDEN DELANEY, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
