Cases 71 - 80 of 20,933
JOHNSON v. LUCHIANO
as 2:2024cv04177
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
LAQUERRE LUCHIANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. MORAZCKA et al
as 2:2024cv04186
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, LT. JOHN DOE, OFFICER JOHN DOE #2 and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCBRIDE v. LAURIE et al
as 2:2024cv04178
Defendant:
OKEEFE, LAYTOYA JONES, RYAN WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
CUSHMIR MCBRIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smallwood
as 2:2024cv04101
Petitioner:
Andrew Smallwood
Respondent:
KEN HOLLIBAUGH, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MATTHEWS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv04108
Plaintiff:
KONATA MATTHEWS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MUHAMMAD v. O'GRADY et al
as 2:2024cv04128
Respondent:
CHIEF PILEGGI, THE CHESTER POLICE STATION, CHIEF AUSTIN and others
Petitioner:
KING WALID A MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUHAMMAD v. OGRADY et al
as 2:2024cv04142
Defendant:
THE CHESTER POLICE STATION, CHESTER POLICE CHIEF OGRADY and CHIEF PILEGGI
Plaintiff:
KING WALID A. MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALSTON v. STANGER et al
as 2:2024cv04144
Defendant:
C.O. STANGER and C.O. PEEPLES
Plaintiff:
LAMAR ALSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LITTLE v. OUTLAW et al
as 2:2024cv04033
Defendant:
EB ADYEMI, CHAPLINE KEN, DANIELLE OUTLAW and others
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMILTON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2024cv03768
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
AMIR HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
