Cases 81 - 90 of 172
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER ETAL et al v. WOLF
as 2:2015cv05431
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
JOEZIEL VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2015cv04703
Plaintiff:
HAROLD ADAMS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and M. FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSEN v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2015cv04539
Petitioner:
ADAM ROSEN
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES, RISA VETRI FERMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GANNAWAY v. GLUNT et al
as 5:2015cv04241
Petitioner:
SHAKUR C. GANNAWAY
Respondent:
STEVEN GLUNT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS COUNTY, READING, JOHN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ADAMS v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2015cv04186
Petitioner:
SHAUN D. ADAMS
Respondent:
PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and TREVOR A. WINGARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKER v. DEL RICCI et al
as 2:2015cv03513
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
THOMAS M. DEL RICCI, MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION, RISA V. FURMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv01718
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, R. SETH WILLIAMS, ADAM JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. TRITT et al
as 5:2014cv05472
Petitioner:
RAUL A. PEREZ-REYES
Respondent:
BRENDA L. TRITT, JOHN T. ADAMS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WASHINGTON v. BODER et al
as 5:2014cv04972
Plaintiff:
ALVIN WASHINGTON
Defendant:
JUSTIN BODER, JOHN T ADAMS, ADAM JOSEPH HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUE et al v. COLLINGDALE BOROUGH POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2014cv04497
Plaintiff:
ANDRE J. LUE, SR. and ERIC N. JONES
Defendant:
COLLINGDALE BOROUGH POLICE DEPT. and ROBERT W. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
