Cases 81 - 90 of 258
DAVIS v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv05596
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Petitioner:
JAMEL DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TALLEY v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv05087
Defendant:
LISA DURAND, C/O B. DAVIS, C/O LAIUVARA and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. COUNTY OF DELAWARE
as 2:2018cv05095
Plaintiff:
TYRONE DAVIS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF DELAWARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LINDER v. FOLCROFT POLICE DEPT et al
as 2:2018cv04844
Defendant:
ASST WARDEN JAMES MATTERA, MEDICAL SERVICES DEPT, DANIEL E. WHITE and others
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM LINDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASTELONIA v. HOLLENBUSH et al
as 2:2018cv04567
Plaintiff:
JARRETT CASTELONIA
Defendant:
BRIAN DAVIS, PATTY KULAGASKI, KOVACLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv04349
Plaintiff:
DAIQUAN DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LOMAX v. SPAIN et al
as 2:2018cv03862
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM LOMAX
Defendant:
TIMOTHY SPAIN and RYAN L. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. PERRI
as 2:2018cv03243
Plaintiff:
MICAH DAVIS
Defendant:
FORTUNATO N. PERRI, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS WARDEN et al
as 2:2018cv03033
Respondent:
PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS WARDEN, JUDGE NAZARIO JIMINEZ, THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT THIRD CIRCUIT AND ITS APPEALS COURT and others
Petitioner:
KEITH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. SMITH et al
as 2:2018cv01956
Petitioner:
PRINCE DAVIS
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
