Cases 1 - 10 of 41
CROSS v. FBI et al
as 2:2023cv05025
Plaintiff:
ALI L. CROSS
Defendant:
FBI, SECRET SERVICE, BENNETT JOSHUA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2023cv00579
Petitioner:
VERNON BENNETT
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BENNETT v. RANSON et al
as 2:2022cv05015
Petitioner:
MALIK BENNETT
Respondent:
sUPERINTENDENT KEVIN RANSON, A.G. JOSH SHAPIRO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE KRASNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHICHARD v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2022cv04082
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WHICHARD
Defendant:
GERALD MURPHY, SEAMUS RADTKE, TIFFANY WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. COLON-ORTIZ et al
as 2:2022cv01591
Plaintiff:
STEPHON M BENNETT
Defendant:
ADIDELYS COLON-ORTIZ, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2020cv00712
Petitioner:
TERRELL BENNETT
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and SCI-CHESTER SUPT. MARRISA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GONDOR v. BENNETT et al
as 2:2019cv05428
Defendant:
RYAN BENNER, MICHAEL MURPHY, UNKNOWN SUPERVISER OF ROBERT BENNET - UDPD and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. GONDOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNETT v. BANKS et al
as 2:2018cv04372
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BANKS, SERGEANT JOHN DOE, WARDEN JOHN DELANY and others
Plaintiff:
HASSAN BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. LOUNG et al
as 5:2018cv01527
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL LOPEZ
Defendant:
LOUNG, ELLIS, BENNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNETT v. MAY et al
as 2:2018cv01447
Plaintiff:
SHAKREE BENNETT
Defendant:
GERALD MAY, BLANCHE CARNEY, JIM KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
