Cases 1 - 10 of 14
PUMBA v. SIDOR et al
as 5:2022cv02900
Plaintiff:
OSVALDO PUMBA
Defendant:
ALEXANDRA SIDOR, ELIZABETH CRUZ, JENNIFER VENDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PUMBA v. KOWAL, et al
as 5:2022cv02082
Plaintiff:
OSVALDO PUMBA
Defendant:
KEITH KOWAL, LILIAN THOMAS, JENNIFER VENDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: KEVIN SHARPE
as 2:2022cv00733
Petitioner:
IN RE: KEVIN SHARPE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
VEGA v. MULLEN et al
as 5:2016cv04620
Plaintiff:
NORMAN MICHAEL VEGA
Defendant:
MICHAEL MULLEN, JENNIFER SHARP, JEFFREY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUSTER v. GAUDENZIA DRC, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03515
Plaintiff:
RICKY BUSTER
Defendant:
GAUDENZIA DRC, INC., PAT O'CONNER, BARBARA SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHARPE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv06632
Plaintiff:
RONALD SHARPE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MUCCI v. TOWNSHIP OF UPPER DARBY et al
as 2:2014cv05215
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI MUCCI
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF UPPER DARBY, MICHAEL TAYLOR, STEPHEN ORSKOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RANDALL v. THE COUNTY OF BERKS, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2014cv05091
Plaintiff:
RAMSEY RANDALL
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF BERKS, PENNSYLVANIA, BERKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, THE PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE OF BERKS COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHARPE v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv07592
Plaintiff:
LONELL SHARPE
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and LAWTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHARP v. WALSH
as 2:2013cv03634
Petitioner:
SHAWN C. SHARP
Respondent:
WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
