Cases 1 - 10 of 118
ANDERSON v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01471
Plaintiff:
KHALID ANDERSON
Defendant:
TERRA, JENKINS and K OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DET. RYAN MCCARTNEY'S SUPERVISOR et al
as 2:2023cv01456
Plaintiff:
CALVIN SMITH
Defendant:
DET. RYAN MCCARTNEY, JDG. D. ANHATT, PUBLIC DEFENDER MONIT ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO BARKER HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISSAAC FULWOOD, PATRICIA VINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWSUAN v. ANDERSON
as 2:2022cv04183
Plaintiff:
MAURICE NEWSUAN
Defendant:
C/O TIMOTHY ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWSUAN v. ANDERSON
as 2:2022cv04126
Plaintiff:
MAURICE NEWSUAN
Defendant:
TIMOTHY ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2022cv03361
Petitioner:
ISAIAH ANDERSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON
as 2:2022cv00677
In Re:
MALIK ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBICHAW v. MCGEE et al
as 2:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
RENALDO M. ROBICHAW
Defendant:
SEAN P. MCGEE, MARK S. MURRAY, GARY CHESNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON et al v. LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2021cv03620
Plaintiff:
DONTAIE ANDERSON, JAWON H. JOHNSON, KAMAR THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON, KYLE RUSSEL, JANINE DONATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. BRIGHTLER et al
as 2:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH MOORE
Defendant:
CONOVEY, CORRECTION OFFICER MERCER, EILEEN BEHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
