Cases 1 - 10 of 21
FEGELY v. COLLINS et al
as 5:2023cv02258
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CHARLES FEGELY, JR.
Defendant:
DAVID C. COLLINS, SR, CAPTAIN LUIS CRUZ, LIEUTENANT ANTHONY PIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv04303
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JAMES KENNEY, BRAD LUKACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STIEF v. ROBESON TOWNSHIP et al
as 5:2020cv06272
Defendant:
ROBESON TOWNSHIP, BRAD BRENNER and ROBESON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL STIEF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv01041
Plaintiff:
DARREN TALBERT
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DELAWARE COUNTY, PA, JOHN J. WHELAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC. et al
as 5:2016cv00643
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARREN
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., CARL A. HOFFMAN, JR., REBECCA F. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. STAAB et al
as 2:2015cv05489
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
JOE STAAB, PHILADELPHIA ITERNAL AFFARS, CHARLES RAMSAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. DEL RICCI et al
as 2:2015cv03513
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
THOMAS M. DEL RICCI, MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION, RISA V. FURMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. O'CONNOR et al
as 2:2015cv03475
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
DAVID O'CONNOR, BRAD MOMME, CHARLES RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. MOMME et al
as 2:2015cv02807
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
BRAD MOMME, DAVID O'CONNOR, CHARLES RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DILLARD v. TALAMANTES et al
as 2:2015cv01270
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ANTHONY DILLARD
Defendant:
G. TALAMANTES, GEORGE NYE, III, D. LENTINI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
