Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CLEMENS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv04595
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CLEMENS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HORSCH v. MAHON et al
as 2:2020cv01154
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RAY HORSCH
Defendant:
RYAN HYDE, DIANE CLEMENS and JUDGE WILLIAM P. MAHON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLEMENS v. MARTYNNICK
as 5:2019cv06213
Defendant:
J. MARTYNNICK
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LEE CLEMENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLEMENS v. WARDEN S.C.I. GREENE et al
as 2:2017cv02455
Petitioner:
LARRY D. CLEMENS
Respondent:
WARDEN S.C.I. GREENE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ________________ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF _______________________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLEMENS v. WARDEN SCI GREENE et al
as 2:2016cv04820
Plaintiff:
LARRY DELROY CLEMENS
Defendant:
WARDEN SCI GREENE, WARDEN SCI GRATERFORD, WARDEN SCI CAMP HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLEMENS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02513
Petitioner:
CHARLES CLEMENS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SEAMON v. BATIZ et al
as 2:2015cv04400
Plaintiff:
VERNON SEAMON
Defendant:
LUIS BATIZ, DEFENDERS ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES A. CUNNINGHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLEMENS v. CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER et al
as 2:2012cv05077
Petitioner:
LARRY DALROY CLEMENS
Respondent:
CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER, H.O.C., DC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CLEMENS v. CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER
as 2:2012cv05067
Plaintiff:
LARRY DALROY CLEMENS
Defendant:
CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY et al v. BEARD et al
as 2:2007cv03723
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY, ANTHONY LOCKE, COREY SMITH and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD and ROBERT S. BITNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
