Cases 1 - 10 of 16
LLOYD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
TAUHEED LLOYD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DELOATCH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv01521
Plaintiff:
SEAN DELOATCH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., BRUCE HERDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv01997
Plaintiff:
LLOYD HAROLD JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LLOYD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03081
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LLOYD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WASHINGTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv04169
Petitioner:
LLOYD WASHINGTON, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LLOYD v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv01499
Plaintiff:
BRAHIN LLOYD
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LLOYD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv03853
Petitioner:
JAMIL LLOYD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LLOYD v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2011cv04306
Petitioner:
DEMETRIUS LLOYD
Respondent:
BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BARCLAY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2011cv00478
Petitioner:
LLOYD VIRGIL BARCLAY
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF THOMAS CORBETT and SUPERINTENDENT LOUIS FOLINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LLOYD v. COMMONWEALT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2009cv04881
Petitioner:
MARCUS LLOYD
Respondent:
COMMONWEALT OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
