Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
LOCKETT v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv06298
Plaintiff: ARMOND A. LOCKETT
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN P. DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLAIN v. KLOPOTOSKI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv07241
Plaintiff: RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR.
Defendant: MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, MALVIN S. LOCKETT, BRIAN V. COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOULTRIE v. LOCKETT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv05113
Petitioner: JOHN MOULTRIE
Respondent: MELVIN S. LOCKETT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KNIGHT v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2008cv05249
Plaintiff: LAWRENCE H. KNIGHT, II
Defendant: MELVIN LOCKETT, O'NEAL and JEFFREY BEARD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RICHARDSON v. LOCKETT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv04677
Petitioner: DAVID DEWEES RICHARDSON
Respondent: MELVIN LOCKETT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YANCEY v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2007cv01963
Petitioner: ANTHONY YANCEY
Respondent: LOCKETT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KELTY v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2007cv01802
Petitioner: STEVEN KELTY
Respondent: LOCKETT, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?