Cases 1 - 10 of 191
ALWARD v. FCI OXFORD
as 2:2024cv02218
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ALWARD
Defendant:
FCI OXFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: ALWARD
as 2:2024cv02202
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ALWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KONATA v. RAMOS et al
as 2:2024cv01902
Plaintiff:
MATTHEWS KONATA
Defendant:
RAMOS, ABDUR-RAZZAQ, HOSKINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALWARD v. ELKTON FSL et al
as 2:2024cv01888
Petitioner:
MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD
Respondent:
ELKTON FSL and BRIAN NEWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ALWARD v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv01894
Petitioner:
MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD and MATTHEW KEITH BERRY
Respondent:
MDOC, WASHTENAW COUNTY and WAYNE COUNTY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALWARD v. FCI OXFORD et al
as 2:2024cv01883
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD and MATTHEW KEITH BERRY
Defendant:
FCI OXFORD, LT. BROESCH and WARDEN EMMERICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMBARDO V. ZANELLI, ET AL
as 5:2024cv01806
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE AMY ZANELLI, ANDREW YOST, MATTHEW STEIDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CASTRO-MOTA v. GIBBONS, et al.
as 2:2024cv01645
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
DIANE E. GIBBONS, JOHN T. FEGLEY, JILL M. GRAZIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01467
Plaintiff:
KONATA MATTHEWS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LOMBARDO v. ZANELLI et al
as 5:2024cv01383
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. LOMBARDO
Defendant:
AMY ZANELLI, OFFICER ANDREW YOST, ROBERT L. NICKELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
