Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Ceasar v. Bradley et al
as 2:2021cv01643
Defendant:
CORIZON, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Dr. Elizabeth Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ceasar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAVIS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01441
Defendant:
WETZEL, DIRECTOR OF PRISON HEALTH SERVICE UNIT, S.C.I. WAYMART, U.M. KAY and others
Plaintiff:
CHAVIS and RONALD CHAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOMAX v. TENNIS et al
as 2:2016cv06566
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOMAX
Defendant:
FRANK J. TENNIS, RICHARD ELLERS, JOHN SYMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2016cv01323
Plaintiff:
WALTER RICHARDSON
Defendant:
JONES, SLACK, LOUIS GIORIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGAN v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, CORIZON et al
as 2:2015cv04475
Plaintiff:
CONFERSO PAGAN
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, CORIZON, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. CORIZON INC. PRISON HEALTH SERVICE et al
as 2:2015cv04141
Plaintiff:
COSME RIVERA
Defendant:
CORIZON INC. PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POUGH v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2015cv03392
Plaintiff:
MARCUS CHARLES POUGH
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, FRANK ABELLO, POTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSES v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES (PHS) CORIZON INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02463
Plaintiff:
ROYAL MOSES
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES (PHS) CORIZON INC., CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv05762
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY A. BEARD, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2014cv05173
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROSARIO
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, JOHN DELANEY, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
