Cases 1 - 10 of 50
IN RE: DAVID TURNER
as 2:2024cv02546
Petitioner:
DAVID TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOUGH v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv01353
Plaintiff:
CHAMPION OC'EAN HOUGH
Defendant:
JUDGE CAPPELLI, DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FREDERICK JACK STALLSTEIMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv03395
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Hayes
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., DIERDRA J REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
TURNER v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL TURNER
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and MICHAEL GARVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. BURKE et al
as 2:2020cv03858
Defendant:
C/O M. TOTO, SUSAN SENDALL, C/O DIXON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMERE TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2020cv03677
Defendant:
MOHAMED MOAHAREK, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DR. J MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET, AL
as 2:2019cv00254
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET, AL
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. BEEBE et al
as 5:2018cv01053
Plaintiff:
RUBEN TURNER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER M. BEEBE and BETHLEHEM CITY POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2017cv01988
Petitioner:
WILLIAM D. TURNER
Respondent:
K. BRITTAIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TURNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv05123
Petitioner:
JAMES TURNER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
