Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
DUBOSE v. FDC PHILA (WARDEN) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03098
Plaintiff: ZUMAR H. DUBOSE
Defendant: FDC PHILA (WARDEN), FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. MARSHAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YANNUZZI v. F.B.I EL PASO TEXAS ARRESTING OFFICER et al
as 2:2022cv01919
Plaintiff: DON EDWARD YANNUZZI, SR.
Defendant: F.B.I EL PASO TEXAS ARRESTING OFFICER, U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE DRIVER ON JULY 13TH 2020 and NAME UNKNOWN FDC PHILLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAYNES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv02685
Petitioner: FREDERICK BAYNES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and U.S. MARSHALL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04036
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03844
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03726
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
ROBINSON v. U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2008cv03186
Plaintiff: SHERROD ROBINSON
Defendant: U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE, COOPER MEDICAL CENTER, TROY LEVI and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SANTOS v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv05153
Petitioner: ANGEL SANTOS
Respondent: TROY LEVI, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and DIRECTOR U.S. MARSHAL'S SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
RICCIO v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv03855
Petitioner: JOHN RICCIO
Respondent: TROY LEVI, WARDEN FDC-PHILA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?