Cases 1 - 10 of 31
PEREZ v. PRO MAX FENCE SYSTEMS, LLC
as 5:2021cv02081
Plaintiff:
REINARDO PEREZ
Defendant:
PRO MAX FENCE SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
ALAMEDA et al v. TW CONSTRUCTION, INC.
as 2:2019cv01070
Defendant:
TW CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Plaintiff:
JAIME MARIN PEREZ and ANGEL PANTOJA ALAMEDA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MORA BEDOLLA et al v. BRANDOLINI et al
as 2:2018cv00146
Plaintiff:
JOSE LUIS MORA BEDOLLA and ANDRES MARTIN JURADO PEREZ
Defendant:
LEWIS J. BRANDOLINI, III and BRANDOLINI COMPANIES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GUICE et al v. DIRECTV, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03379
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GUICE , STEVEN SCOTT , THOMAS PEDICORD and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV, LLC and DIRECTSAT, USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
AYALA HERRERA et al v. ROLLING GREEN LANDSCAPE AND DESIGN, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03176
Plaintiff:
HECTOR AYALA HERRERA and OVIDIO MENENDEZ PEREZ
Defendant:
ROLLING GREEN LANDSCAPE AND DESIGN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
PEREZ v. THE SCANLAN AGENCY, INC.
as 2:2016cv06197
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
THE SCANLAN AGENCY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. STEVEN KEARES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05072
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
STEVEN KEARES, INC., HARRY S. KEARES and STEVEN KEARS, INC. 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. BELANGER et al
as 2:2016cv04427
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
A. KENNETH BELANGER, JO-ANN I. BELANGER and BELANGER AND CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. CHESTER UPLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2016cv04004
Plaintiff:
NANCY PEREZ
Defendant:
CHESTER UPLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
PEREZ v. LAS MARGARITAS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01390
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
LAS MARGARITAS, INC. , FELIPE PEREZ and VICTOR PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
