Cases 91 - 100 of 150
ROE v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33846
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. ROE
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv04652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
REIS v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv73799
Defendant:
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY, A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
AGOSTINHO DIAS REIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAUDE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv01767
Plaintiff:
JAMES MAUDE and JAMES MAUDE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., JANE DOE(S) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRENSHAW et al v. MCALOCUM et al
as 2:2009cv00685
Plaintiff:
BRANDI LLOYD CRENSHAW, OLIVER CRENSHAW, REIAYANAMI CRENSHAW and others
Defendant:
MCALOCUM, JOHN DOE, RICHARD ROE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MARTINEZ et al v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2009cv00026
Plaintiff:
JUAN MARTINEZ and ELIZABETH MARTINEZ
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, VINCENT GUARINI, STEVEN NAPOLITAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv04852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAEZ v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv04327
Plaintiff:
LUIS G. BAEZ, SR.
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LEWIS v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv04296
Plaintiff:
HASON L. LEWIS
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv03972
Plaintiff:
MARY ROE
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
