Cases 131 - 140 of 5,285
ANTHONY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv03852
Plaintiff:
ROMEL ANTHONY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSEPH SILVESTRI & SON, INC.
as 2:2023cv03822
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSEPH SILVESTRI & SON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
NOWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv03813
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM NOWELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ELMAKAYES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv03873
Plaintiff:
DAVID ELMAKAYES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HIGHTOWER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2023cv03812
Petitioner:
JACQUELINE HIGHTOWER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
HANDY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv03738
Plaintiff:
LATONYA HANDY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
HITE v. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 2:2023cv03713
Plaintiff:
Gale Hite
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv03701
Plaintiff:
FAUSTO MARTINEZ
Lead Plaintiff:
NINE BROTHERS SUPERMARKET, Inc.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv03735
Petitioner:
DEMITRIOUS DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $161,354.08 IN U.S. CURRENCY
as 2:2023cv03631
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$161,354.08 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
