Cases 11 - 20 of 143
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SHIP'S POINT LLC v. BARTKOWSKI
as 2:2021mc00059
Plaintiff:
SHIP'S POINT LLC
Defendant:
THADDEUS J. BARTKOWSKI, III
Garnishee:
TD BANK and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
CHECCHIA v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
as 2:2021cv03585
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CHECCHIA
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Fielding Sr. v. RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02737
Defendant:
MORTGAGE LENDERS NETWORK USA INC., Lex Special Assets LLC, MTGLQ INVESTORS LP and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Fielding Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02462
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
FEEHAN v. TRANS UNION LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02085
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA doing business as BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. doing business as BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC. and TRANS UNION LLC
Plaintiff:
JOHN FEEHAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00667
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06519
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
MAZZA et al v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv03253
Plaintiff:
MARK MAZZA, LISA MAZZA and SOPHIA MAZZA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS 1-10, MERSCORP HOLDINGS INC., BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
