Cases 11 - 20 of 74
DITTMAR v. MAROSE et al
as 5:2015cv05714
Plaintiff:
SCOTT M. DITTMAR
Defendant:
JEN MAROSE, JONIE KNEAGE, NICOLE REISS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERGUSON et al v. NOBLES
as 2:2014cv01439
Plaintiff:
ERIC FERGUSON , MICHELLE SANTANA , EFRAIN SANTANA and others
Defendant:
ANGEL NOBLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PACHECO et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05827
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH PACHECO , DOREEN TRACEY , KATHRYN DENAUT and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FIELDS et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, et al
as 2:2013cv05817
Plaintiff:
JAMES FIELDS , ROBERT FORD , RICHARD FULKERSON and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56538
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO CORA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CORA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59686
Plaintiff:
ARTURO R CORA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LAPRADE et al v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67486
Plaintiff:
GARNETT S. LAPRADE and CORA LAPRADE
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FAGAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65441
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F FAGAN and CORA H FAGAN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BASSITT et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65375
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E BASSITT and CORA JAYNE BASSITT
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPENCER et al v. 84 LUMBER et al
as 2:2011cv01184
Plaintiff:
CORA SPENCER
Defendant:
84 LUMBER, WESTERN AUTO SUPPLY, WEIL MCLAIN and others
Movant:
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
