Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
HOOKER v. TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. et al
as 2:2008cv77678
Plaintiff: HAZEL HOOKER
Defendant: TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
HOOKER v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74805
Plaintiff: DOREEN LIPFORD HOOKER
Defendant: 3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
HOOKER v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. et al
as 2:2008cv69681
Plaintiff: EDDIE HOOKER
Defendant: MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO., AMERICAN OPITCAL CORPORATION, THE BENDIX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HOOKER v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 2:2008cv67568
Plaintiff: MATTIE HOOKER
Defendant: OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
HOOKER v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv64572
Plaintiff: EDWARD HOOKER and EDWARD HOOKER
Defendant: ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LOONEY et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO
as 2:2007cv73790
Plaintiff: HARVEY HOOKER LOONEY and ROBERT ANTHONY SCOTT, SR
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HOOKER v. RITE AID PHARMACY
as 2:2007cv04319
Plaintiff: COREY A. HOOKER
Defendant: RITE AID PHARMACY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOOKER v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
as 2:2007cv02639
Plaintiff: COREY A. HOOKER
Defendant: UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOOKER v. THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2007cv00688
Plaintiff: COREY A. HOOKER
Defendant: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?