Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05955
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
LOPEZ et al v. BRENNTAG SPECIALTIES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00827
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN LOPEZ and SONIA LOPEZ
Defendant:
BRENNTAG NORTHEAST, LLC, ABC CORPORATIONS (A-Z), BRENNTAG SPECIALTIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEIGEL v. ARIA HEALTH
as 2:2018cv05550
Defendant:
ARIA HEALTH, XYZ CORPS. 1-10 and JOHN AND JANE DOES (1-10)
Plaintiff:
CARLTON SEIGEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARMON v. HARMON et al
as 2:2018cv00875
Plaintiff:
CURTIS T. HARMON, III
Defendant:
PAMELA HARMON and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1 -10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CINTRON-GARCIA v. SANTIAGO-DEJESUS et al
as 5:2018cv00456
Plaintiff:
MARCELINA CINTRON-GARCIA
Defendant:
JESUS SANTIAGO-DEJESUS, DANIEL T. WHITE, C. MORAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAZ v. RUCKER et al
as 2:2016cv00205
Plaintiff:
CLARISSA DIAZ
Defendant:
COMER RUCKER, SCOTT PAUL , MICHAEL WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS et al v. AMERICHOICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 2:2015cv02650
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ROSS and SANDRA D. DIXON-ROSS
Defendant:
AMERICHOICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, DETHLEFS-PYKOSH SHOOK & MURPHY LAW GROUP, LLC , JONATHAN KONTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
REILLY FOAM CORPORATION v. TRODAT USA, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01204
Plaintiff:
REILLY FOAM CORPORATION
Defendant:
TRODAT USA, LLC, M&R MARKING SYSTEMS, INC., M&R MARKING SYSTEMS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GLICKMAN v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv05393
Plaintiff:
JACOB R. GLICKMAN
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
