Cases 11 - 20 of 326,781
COSTANZA v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv05095
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COSTANZA
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05082
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
THORNTON v. MASON
as 2:2024cv05097
Petitioner:
TROY THORNTON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT BERNADETTE MASON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURNS v. ACCURATE INSULATION, LLC
as 2:2024cv05089
Defendant:
ACCURATE INSULATION, LLC
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BURNS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
STEEL et al v. THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
as 2:2024cv05041
Plaintiff:
RYAN STEEL and SARAH STEEL
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CHICKIE'S & PETE'S, INC. v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv05043
Defendant:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CHICKIE'S & PETE'S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
