Cases 21 - 30 of 157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02810
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
UNDERWOOD et al v. KAB BUSINESS HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 5:2020cv00881
Plaintiff:
INA SCHNITZER, RACHEL BERNSTEIN, JESSICA HINTON and others
Defendant:
KAB BUSINESS HOLDINGS, INC. and KELLY BLAKESLEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROSARIO v. HILDEBRAND et al
as 5:2020cv00540
Defendant:
ESTES EXPRESS LINES CORPORATION, ESTES EXPRESS LINES and CHARLES R. HILDEBRAND
Plaintiff:
ADOLFO A. ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
ROSARIO v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv06211
Petitioner:
NATHAN ROSARIO
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL CLARK and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROSARIO v. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
as 2:2019cv06017
Petitioner:
JOSUE SANTIAGO ROSARIO
Respondent:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RODRIGUEZ v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 5:2019cv02771
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
ABEL ROSARIO RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02222
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ROSARIO v. READING HOSPITAL et al
as 5:2019cv02170
Defendant:
TROOPER BRIAN ROLAND, MAGISTRAIT ANN L. YOUNG, TROOPER GARY A. WILLIARD, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS A. ROSARIO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. RANDALL
as 5:2019cv02117
Defendant:
BRITTANY M. RANDALL
Plaintiff:
ELENA ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
