Cases 21 - 30 of 246
POOLE v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2022cv02019
Petitioner:
ANDREW POOLE
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTAIN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AUSTIN v. SMITH et al
as 2:2022cv01125
Petitioner:
JOSEPH D. AUSTIN
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FARRELL v. SUPT. OLIVERIA
as 2:2022cv00607
Petitioner:
JOHN FARRELL
Respondent:
SUPT. OLIVERIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EPPS v. MCGINLEY, SUP'T SCI COAL TOWNSHIP
as 2:2022cv00096
Petitioner:
KEITH EPPS
Respondent:
TOM MCGINLEY and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURNS v. SORBER et al
as 2:2022cv00160
Petitioner:
STEVEN BURNS
Respondent:
JAIME SORBER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv05684
Petitioner:
DARNELL BROWN
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and SUPERINTENDENT THOMAS MCGINLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HART v. ANGELUCCI
as 2:2021cv05085
Petitioner:
JOHN HART
Respondent:
STEPHEN ANGELUCCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COLON v. RIVELLO et al
as 2:2021cv04486
Petitioner:
Mr. WILLIAM COLON
Respondent:
Superintendent JOHN RIVELLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SAMUELS VS SUPERINTENDENT, SCI FAYETTE ET AL
as 2:2021cv03417
Petitioner:
MALIK SAMUELS
Respondent:
SCI FAYETTE SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRYANT v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2021cv03075
Petitioner:
BRYANT A RICHARD and RICHARD A. BRYANT
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ERIC ARMEL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE KRASNER, ESQ, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSHUA SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
