Cases 21 - 30 of 83
DIYA et al v. BYRNES et al
as 2:2017cv03536
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER DMOTOMIWA DIYA and TRACY ROY MARTIN
Defendant:
BYRNES, JOHN D. SWIDER, COMPANY OF KEEFE - TKC HOLDING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CHESTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv01138
Plaintiff:
GARTOR KIKI BROWN
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY, CHESTER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, CHESTER COUNTY SHERIFF JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. CARTER et al
as 2:2017cv01019
Plaintiff:
JAMES HOLMES
Respondent:
CARTER, MOODY, BALDWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. KORSNICK et al
as 2:2016cv05289
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER PETERSON
Defendant:
JOE KORSNICK , CAROL BOWSER , JACKIE WOODS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. STANISH et al
as 2:2016cv05053
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN ELITE BAILEY
Defendant:
STANISH and C.O.'S WORKING MEDICAL DEPARTMENT AT S.C.I. DALLAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEMP v. SCI-GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2016cv01609
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JERMAINE KEMP
Defendant:
SCI-GRATERFORD and MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. BERKS COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2016cv01488
Plaintiff:
DAVID LUIS PEREZ
Defendant:
BERKS COUNTY PRISON, BAUERLE, PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2016cv00549
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY L. COOPER
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, FRANK GREEN, GRIFFITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYTLE v. THE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
as 5:2016cv00185
Plaintiff:
DALTON J. LYTLE
Defendant:
THE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLAMER v. SCI GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2015cv06879
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY FLAMER
Defendant:
SCI GRATERFORD, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
