Cases 31 - 40 of 84
JOHNSON v. MARIO AMIR JOHNSON ESTATE ET AL. et al
as 2:2023cv00674
Plaintiff:
MARIO AMIR JOHNSON
Defendant:
MARIO AMIR JOHNSON ESTATE ET AL., SA'NYA MONE' JOHNSON ESTATE, SHAR'DAE CAMILLE JOHNSON ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
BRODIE et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 2:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BRODIE and JIMENA APARICIO HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, PEGGY PETROVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
CLARK v. HARCHA, III et al
as 2:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
DEJON LAMAR CHRISTOPHER CLARK
Defendant:
HOWARD H. HARCHA, III, ANTONY BLINKEN, ANDREW SAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
