Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 118
ALLEN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01066
Defendant: DREW RICE, MICHAEL REPICI, JOSEPH MEARS and others
Plaintiff: BAKEER ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSH v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00932
Plaintiff: BRAD RUSH
Defendant: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and OFFICER RICHARD NICOLETTI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02474
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MCKENNEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv00326
Plaintiff: NIJEE MCKENNEY
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DAVID O'CONNOR and BRAD MOMME
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. BRAD BYRNE COMPLETE LAWN MAINTENANCE et al
as 2:2017cv05010
Plaintiff: MELVIN RIVERA
Defendant: BRAD BYRNE COMPLETE LAWN MAINTENANCE and BRAD BYRNE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04950
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04979
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04049
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DOMINION DEALER SOLUTIONS, LLC et al v. BALDWIN et al
as 2:2017cv02420
Plaintiff: DOMINION DEALER SOLUTIONS, LLC and DOMINION ENTERPRISES
Defendant: MATTHEW BALDWIN , BRAD LEDONNE and REDLINE AUTOMOTIVE MERCHANDISING LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
FOUR SEASONS PRODUCE, INC. v. BRAD'S RAW CHIPS, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv01007
Plaintiff: FOUR SEASONS PRODUCE, INC.
Defendant: BRAD'S RAW CHIPS, LLC , PERGAMENT ADVISORS LLC , KIMBER E. MESSNER and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?