Cases 31 - 40 of 62
JONES v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2016cv05466
Petitioner:
DONTEY H. JONES
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MIKELL v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2016cv05086
Petitioner:
DAMIEN MIKELL
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DILL v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2016cv04780
Petitioner:
ALFRED DILL
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMYER and STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT FOREST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2016cv04762
Petitioner:
QUAWI SMITH
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMYER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ______________ and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BUENO v. OVERMYER et al
as 5:2016cv04468
Petitioner:
CHRISTIAN BUENO
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SCHAEFFER v. OVERMYER
as 2:2016cv03894
Petitioner:
MICHAEL SCHAEFFER
Respondent:
M. OVERMYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ARTACHE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv03753
Petitioner:
JAVIER ARTACHE
Respondent:
M. OVERMYER, KATHLEEN KANE and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WEST v. OVERMYER
as 2:2016cv03722
Petitioner:
JASON ISAAC WEST
Respondent:
M.D. OVERMYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GREEN v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv03630
Plaintiff:
RODNEY GREEN
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. , CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC , MICHAEL OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALSAVAGE v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2016cv03073
Petitioner:
RICHARD T. BALSAVAGE
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
