Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 999
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01747
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
WHOLAVER v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00492
Plaintiff: ERNEST RAY WHOLAVER, JR.
Defendant: MR. JOHN E. WETZEL, MR. JAMIE SORBER and JANE/JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv05569
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
POSTELL v. RAY et al
as 2:2021cv05146
Plaintiff: JULIUS POSTELL
Defendant: P/O MARQUISE RAY, P/O PAUL MOORE IV, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWMAN v. REDMOND et al
as 2:2021cv04673
Plaintiff: RAY NEWMAN
Defendant: DALE REDMOND, TOTAL PACKAGE EXPRESS, INC. and R&H TRUCKING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Miller et al
as 2:2021cv03012
Lead Plaintiff: Kelly Miller and CLIFFORD K. MILLER
Defendant: Wayne Kriebel and Ray's Tire Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. KRIEBEL, et al.
as 5:2021cv03012
Plaintiff: Kelly Miller and CLIFFORD K. MILLER
Defendant: Wayne Kriebel and Ray's Tire Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WARD et al v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02489
Plaintiff: DONALD RAY WARD, JR. and LAURA WARD
Defendant: VIFOR (INTERNATIONAL) AG, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., AMERICAN REGENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02292
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAY v. SPORTSMAN'S WAREHOUSE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00967
Defendant: JON BARKER, JOSEPH P SCHNEIDER, CHRISTOPHER EASTLAND and others
Plaintiff: ARIAN RAY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?