Cases 41 - 50 of 6,813
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, SUMMIT PARK EAST, GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, MICHAEL AMMANN, (16) PA SUPREME COURT PER CURIAM JANE/JOHN DOES for the June 26-23 and others
Cross Defendant:
SUMMIT PARK EAST, GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO., JUDGE PATRICK F. DUGAN, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, Summit Park East, GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OSORIO et al v. NIEWISCH
as 5:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
LISETTE OSORIO and DANIEL OSORIO
Defendant:
REINER NIEWISCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LAROCHE v. COX
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA LAROCHE
Defendant:
DANIEL S. COX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MAGGITTI v. PULLANO et al
as 2:2023cv05141
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
MICHAEL PULLANO, JOSEPH F KAMPHERSTEIN III, CLAIRE REEVES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HENDRICKSON v. COMCAST CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv05072
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE HENDRICKSON
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION d/b/a XFINITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Burton v. Craig et al
as 2:2023cv05020
Plaintiff:
DERRICK BURTON
Defendant:
Detective Daniel Craig, SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
