Cases 51 - 60 of 71
HART v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
as 2:2012cv06168
Plaintiff:
APRIL HART
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 260
ADAMS v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
as 2:2012cv05689
Plaintiff:
ERICA H. ADAMS
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2609 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
CAVE et al v. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05366
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. CAVE and PAMELA L. SMITH
Defendant:
SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DUKE v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv05179
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DUKE
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BOLGER et al v. CHASE BANK USA, N.A. et al
as 2:2012cv04133
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. BOLGER and LAURIE B. BOLGER
Defendant:
CHASE BANK USA, N.A. and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
KELLY v. OCWEN FEDERAL BANK, FSB et al
as 2:2012cv01501
Plaintiff:
CLARA KELLY
Defendant:
OCWEN FEDERAL BANK, FSB and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DUNLAP v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
as 2:2012cv00922
Plaintiff:
BILLY W. DUNLAP
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
CAVE et al v. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv04586
Plaintiff:
LISA CAVE and SCOTT CAVE
Defendant:
SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
DENENBERG et al v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE et al
as 2:2011cv02840
Plaintiff:
GLADYS DENENBERG , STEPHEN DEITCH and JOYCE DEITCH
Defendant:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE , OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC , HOMEQ SERVICING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAY v. YAVIL et al
as 2:2011cv02518
Plaintiff:
T. BARRY GRAY
Defendant:
DAVID A. YAVIL, WALTER H. SWAYZE, SEGAL MCCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
