Cases 61 - 69 of 69
WATKINS v. ITM RECORDS et al
as 2:2014cv01049
Plaintiff:
JAMES WATKINS
Defendant:
ITM RECORDS, AMAZON.COM, INC., RELATIVITY MEDIA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
HEIMBACH et al v. AMAZON.COM, INC. et al
as 5:2013cv06385
Plaintiff:
NEAL HEIMBACH and KAREN SALASKY
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC. , AMAZON.COM DEDC, LLC , AMAZON.COM DEDC, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv02883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
HATER PRUUF, INC. v. MEE APPAREL, LLC. et al
as 5:2013cv00763
Plaintiff:
HATER PRUUF, INC.
Defendant:
MEE APPAREL, LLC. , ICONIX BRAND GROUP, INC. , ZAZZLE.COM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
TERI WOODS PUBLISHING, LLC et al v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2012cv04854
Plaintiff:
TERI WOODS PUBLISHING, LLC and TERI WOODS
Defendant:
DESEAN WILLIAMS, GASCH PRINTING, INC., THE GLOBE PRINTING CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
INNOVATIVE OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. v. SDI TECHNOLOGIES INC. et al
as 5:2012cv02276
Plaintiff:
INNOVATIVE OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant:
SDI TECHNOLOGIES INC., LIFEWORKS TECHNOLOGY GROUP LLC, RADIOSHACK CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
INNOVATIVE OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. v. AMAZON.COM, INC. et al
as 5:2010cv04487
Plaintiff:
INNOVATIVE OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., EBAY INC., ALIBABA.COM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv02861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
LEWICKI v. LEGACY ENTERTAINMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2006cv01130
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN JON LEWICKI
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., LEGACY ENTERTAINMENT INC., PRO ACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
