Cases 71 - 80 of 192
MCALISTER v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv05008
Plaintiff:
JAMES MCALISTER
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and AETNA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRISTOL v. VIA et al
as 2:2012cv01570
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ANTHONY BRISTOL
Defendant:
NICHOLAS VIA and VARELA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LITTLE v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv00514
Plaintiff:
DEROTHA LITTLE
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BROWN v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv00299
Plaintiff:
JUDY BROWN
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEBB v. BRISTOL BOROUGH et al
as 2:2011cv07834
Plaintiff:
RITCHIE WEBB
Defendant:
BRISTOL BOROUGH , ARNOLD A. PORTER , JOSEPH MOORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWRENCE v. FARRUGGIO'S BRISTOL AND PHILADELPHIA AUTO EXPRESS INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07189
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LAWRENCE
Defendant:
FARRUGGIO'S BRISTOL AND PHILADELPHIA AUTO EXPRESS INC. and SAMUEL J FARRUGGIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CALLAHAN v. BOROUGH OF BRISTOL et al
as 2:2011cv06977
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND CALLAHAN
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF BRISTOL, ELIFA SOTO, WILLIAM DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRISTOL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv58903
Plaintiff:
STANLEY E. BRISTOL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BRISTOL v. MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv59953
Plaintiff:
LARRY BRISTOL
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
