Cases 81 - 90 of 157
PEARSON v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv40343
Plaintiff:
LYLE A PEARSON
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PEARSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv04185
Plaintiff:
DONALD PEARSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DELANEY and LAWTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERKO v. AMERICAN STEAMSHIP CO. et al
as 2:2011cv33424
Plaintiff:
PAUL T. FERKO
Defendant:
AMERICAN STEAMSHIP CO. , HURON CEMENT/NATIONAL GYPSUM , KINSMAN LINES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PEARSON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv01505
Plaintiff:
CARL PEARSON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DEGGINGER et al v. PEARSON EDUCATION, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv01302
Plaintiff:
PHIL DEGGINGER and ESTATE OF ED DEGGINGER
Defendant:
PEARSON EDUCATION, INC. and JOHN DOE PRINTERS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
PEARSON et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60494
Plaintiff:
FORREST G. PEARSON and MARION PEARSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , KEENE CORPORATION , NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEARSON et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31185
Plaintiff:
EDWARD W PEARSON , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PEARSON v. A C & S, INC.
as 2:2010cv84652
Plaintiff:
WALTER H. PEARSON
Defendant:
A C & S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEARSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv56758
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. PEARSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PEARSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57433
Plaintiff:
ROLLAND V. PEARSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
