Cases 1 - 10 of 67
ROBERTS v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2022cv04829
Plaintiff:
JARVIS ROBERTS
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, COUNTY OF BERKS, CITY OF READING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02175
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01109
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
JARVIS v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv00728
Plaintiff:
TERRELL JARVIS
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
LAI v. JARVIS et al
as 2:2019cv05363
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. JARVIS, JEANETTE M. JARVIS and DONALD E. JARVIS
Plaintiff:
HIUWOON LAI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jarvis v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv20154
Plaintiff:
Shirley Jarvis
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARPE & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diss et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv20074
Plaintiff:
Joseph Engolia, Cecil Campbell, Victor Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MCKESSON CORP. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITTAKER v. BOULEVARD AUTOGROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv04598
Plaintiff:
GENESIS WHITTAKER
Defendant:
BOULEVARD AUTOGROUP, LLC , JARVIS PINARD-MCKINNEY , CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691
JARVIS v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02904
Plaintiff:
CAROL COFFEY JARVIS
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON , C.R. BARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
