Cases 1 - 10 of 1,609
Oree v. Adams et al
as 2:2024cv05393
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and MELINDA ADAMS
Petitioner:
Joel Oree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Adams v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv05047
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
David Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LaPLACA v. KEVIN ASCHINGER et al
as 2:2024cv04993
Plaintiff:
BARBARA LaPLACA
Defendant:
JAMIE ADAM ASCHINGER and KEVIN ASCHINGER doing business as KAT Kevin Aschinger Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
ADAMS v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv04953
Plaintiff:
KENNA ADAMS
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DIARRA v. JACKSON et al
as 2:2024cv04733
Plaintiff:
MOUSSA U'NFA DIARRA
Defendant:
ROBERT LEONARD, GREGORY ADAM, DANIEL M. COURSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Adams v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03470
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK, INC.
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ADAMS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03388
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
LATRINA ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.