Cases 1 - 10 of 1,589
Adams v. PANERA BREAD COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv02137
Plaintiff:
Luke Adams
Defendant:
PANERA BREAD COMPANY and PANERA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
ADAMS v. KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2024cv01679
Plaintiff:
SHAMAR ADAMS
Defendant:
KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
POMROY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01416
Plaintiff:
SHERRI POMROY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN DOE, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER ADAM TRUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Hudwell et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01226
Plaintiff:
Malika Hudwell, Ikeem Adams, Malika Hudwell on behalf of minor children Z.H.T. and N.H.A. and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
ADAMS et al v. RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ADAMS and CONRAD EVERETT
Defendant:
RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC and RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC doing business as BRANDPOINT SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Charpentier et al v. Adams et al
as 2:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Charpentier and Samara Charpentier
Defendant:
Dallas Gatley, Kris Raymond Adams and Jamie Palverento
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00718
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
